>> I CALL THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR
[1. Roll Call - Announcement of a Quorum]
[00:00:07]
DALLAS COUNTY -- MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -- DALLAS COUNTY BOARD OF WEBSITE AND REGISTER TO SPEAK DURING THE REGULAR COMMENT PORTION.THIS EDUCATION WORK FORCE COMMITTEE MEETING IS BROADCAST OVER THE INTERVIEW AND AUDIO AND TRANSCRIPT WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE.
THE MEETING IS POSTED ACCORDING TO LAW.
[2. Certification of Notice Posted for the Meeting]
>> I CERTIFY THE MEETING HAS BEEN RECORDED.
>> ANY CITIZEN WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD?
[4.1. Policy Development]
>> I'LL DEFINITELY MAKE MY PART QUICK.
>> SO MY OFFICE DRAFTED THAT FRAMEWORK.
AND HANDED IT OVER TO THE LEGAL OFFICE WHO REFINED IT INTO THE POLICY THAT WE HAVE FOR YOU TODAY.
I'M HERE JUST IF YOU HAVE SOME SPECIFIC QUESTIONS AS IT RELA REQUIREMENTS.
WE HAVE A DRAFT OF THE POLICY AMENDMENT.
AS EFFECTING THE RELEVANT POLICIES THAT WE'LL DISCUSS UP HERE.
WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS WALK THROUGH THE CURRENT POLICY STRUCTURE AND TALK ABOUT THE ISSUES THAT EXIST WITHIN IT AND OUR PROPOSAL FOR A POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
SO T OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT POLICY STRUCTURE.
SO T AS IT EXISTS, IS SPONSORED BY TASB, TEXAS ASSOCIATE OF SCHOOL BOARDS AN ASSOCIATION THAT SERVES OR ASSISTS WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOL BOARDS.
THEY ASSIST US IN PUBLISHING THE POLICY MANUAL, PROVIDING PERIODIC UPDATES, I BELIEVE ON A QUARTERLY BASIS THEY PROVIDE UPDATES.
IN A HIT OUR POLICIES, THEY ARE ORGANIZED IN THE MANUAL, WE'VE GOT LOCAL POLICIES WHICH ARE AS THEY SAY LOCAL.
THEY ARE ADOPTED BY THE BOARD.
WE'VE GOT -- POLICIES THAT ARE RECITATIONS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS.
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE REGULATIONS AS WELL AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINIONS AND CASE LAW.
THEY POLICY IS -- PROVIDES COLOR, IF YOU WILL, TO THE -- OR MENTION TO THE LEGAL POLICIES.
IN A REGULATIONS, WHICH ARE THE RULES AND REQUIREMENTS THAT DRIVE THE BUSINESS OF THE COLLEGE.
EXHIBITS ARE FORMS, GLOSSARIES, DOCUMENTS THAT WE PUT OUT THAT ARE HOUSED WITHIN THE MANUAL.
WITH DOCUMENTS ARE ORGANIZED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER.
THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE ACTUALLY RELATED TO THE OPERATIONS OF OUR BUSINESS.
SO DISTRICT FOUNDATIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, SUPPORT SERVICES, BUSINESS FINANCE AND INSTRUCTION.
THOSE ARE RELATED TO PERSONNEL, STUDENTS, AND COMMUNITY.
SO THAT EXISTS IN REGULATIONS.
THOSE ARE ANYTHING NOT CONTAINED IN THE ACTUAL BOARD POLICY MANUAL.
PROCEDURES, GUIDELINES, AND HANDBOOKS.
SO I WILL DEFINE THOSE MORE OVER THE NEXT SLIDE.
SO WHAT EXACTLY IS THAT? WE USE THE TERM VERY LOOSELY AS YOU PROBABLY HEARD TODAY.
AND THOSE ARE ACTUALLY GOVERNING STATEMENTS.
ALL OF THEM MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD BEFORE THEY
[00:05:02]
ACTUALLY BECOME A POLICY WITHIN THE DISTRICT.COMPARED TO THE ONES ON THE RIGHT WHICH ARE THE RULES AND PROCEDURES.
IN A TYPICALLY WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE ENTIRE COLLEGE.
RIGHT? THEY REFLECT OUR MISSION.
THEY RELATE TO OUR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES.
THEY HELP US IN COMPLYING WITH THE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER.
AND THE GUIDANCE OF OUR COLLEGE BUSINESS.
THERE'S A DISTINCTION BETWEEN TASB AND COLLEGE INITIATED POLICIES.
WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT BUT WANTED TO LAY THAT OUT HERE.
IN ADDITION, WE'VE GOT -- THEY CAN INCLUDE PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES.
AND PROCEDURES ARE NOT AUTHORITATIVE AND BINDING.
SO W PROCEDURE, YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT THE HOW.
THE WHO, THE WHEN, AND THE WHAT OF THE PROCEDURE.
IT'S GOING TO ACTUALLY GIVE COLOR TO THE POLICY THAT IT WAS RELATED TO.
THE INTERPRETATIONS OF THAT LANGUAGE.
SO IT'S THE SHOULD, HOW SHOULD I IMPLEMENT THIS? HOW SHOULD I PROCEED BY IT? HANDBOOKS ARE REALLY COLLECTIONS OR COLLECTIVES IF YOU WILL.
THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO AGAIN STATE THE MISSION RELATED TO THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE CONSTITUENCIES THEY APPLY.
WE HAVE STUDENT HANDBOOKS, EMPLOYEE HANDBOOKS.
THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO RECITE THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THERE.
DURING THE POLICY CYCLE, WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO ENTAIL? WHAT ARE THE KEY THINGS THAT SHOULD DRIVE IT? IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE EFFECTIVE, YOU NEED EARLY INPUT AND STAKEHOLDERS AND CONSISTENT INPUT THROUGHOUT.
THAT'S THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE STAGE OF THE POLICY LIFE CYCLE.
THAT REVIEW AND APPROVAL, DISTRIBUTION, AND TRACKING AND UPDATING OF POLICIES.
SO I COUNTY'S POLICY LIFE CYCLE, WE'VE GOT SOME PROBLEMS. SO DANIELLE'S GROUP DID BRING US THE INITIAL DRAFT IDEA FOR THIS.
BUT WE'VE IDENTIFIED THIS AS -- FOR AWHILE BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT.
FOR PROCESS HAS BEEN VERY SILENT.
SO THE -- DEPARTMENT IS WHERE POLICY BEGINS AND ENDS.
WE DON'T HAVE MUCH INPUT FROM STAKE HOLDERS, AT LEAST NOT THROUGHOUT -- THAT'S REALLY -- BECAUSE NERD FOR US TO REALLY UNDERSTAND HOW IT'S GOING TO WORK IN PRACTICE, WE NEED ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION THROUGHOUT.
MEANING, THEY'VE NEVER COME TO YOU FOR APPROVAL.
THEY'RE NOT INCLUDED IN THE BOARD POLICY MANUAL.
SO THERE NEEDS TO BE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THOSE.
BECAUSE THERE'S MISS APPREHENSION.
ONE OF OUR ROLES AND THE AUTHORITY OF DOCUMENTS.
THER ABOUT THOSE DISTINCTIONS.
IN ADDITION TO WHERE POLICY LIVES.
SO THE BOARD POLICY MANUAL LIVES ON OUR WEBSITE.
THERE'S AN ESSENTIAL DEPOSITORY FOR ALL POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND REGULATIONS AND EVERYTHING ELSE, WHERE PEOPLE CAN REFERENCE IT AND IT'S ACCESSIBLE TO ALL.
THER APPLICATION OF THE DOCUMENTS.
WE TALKED ABOUT THESE WHEN WE DID THE POLICIES AND AMENDMENTS.
PRIOR TO OUR ORGANIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE POLICIES, WE HAD DIFFERENT DISCIPLINE CARRY PROCEDURES AT EVERY CAMPUS, RIGHT? SO T APPLICATION OF OUR RULES AND REQUIREMENTS.
SO THE OBJECTIVE IS TO REALLY GET A DEFINED PROCESS IN PLACE THAT CLEARLY DELINEATES ALL OF THOSE DIFFERENT GROUPS.
AND COLLABORATION THAT WE NEED IN ORDER TO MAKE THE POLICIES EFFECTIVE AND
[00:10:03]
ACTUALLY HAVE THEM WORK IN PRACTICE.AND ALSO INCREASE AWARENESS AND VIABILITY OF THE DOCUMENTS.
SO S RIGHT, IS ACTUALLY FOCUSED ON OUR POLICY PROCESS, PROPOSED POLICY PROCESS, WHICH WILL IDENTIFY A POLICY NAME, STAKEHOLDERS, PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL.
>> IT'S GOOD YOU TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE TRANSITION TO ONE COLLEGE TO REVIEW.
AND I GUESS NOW, YOU SAID -- MAKES THIS OH WE'RE RESPONDING FOR REQUIREMENT BECAUSE WE HAVE MOVED TO ONE COLLEGE.
IT'S GOOD YOU'RE TAKING IT FURTHER THAN THAT TO ESTABLISH A PROCESS FOR HOW WE DEAL WITH POLICY, WHETHER IT'S CREATE NEW OR WHAT WE HAVE.
SO AS I MENTIONED, THERE ARE TASB INITIATED AND COLLEGE INITIATED POLICIES.
THIS PROCESS FOCUSES ON THE COLLEGE PROCESS FIRST.
ESSE COLLEGE COMMUNITY IS ABLE TO INITIATE OR WOULD BE ABLE TO INITIATE A POLICY OR THROUGH AN INITIATION FORM.
WHEN I SAY INITIATE A POLICY, I MEAN START THE PROCESS.
THAT IS SUBMITTED TO THE FUNCTIONAL AREA LEADER.
AND THAT LEADER REVIEWS IT FOR SUFFICIENCY, MEANING DOES IT SUPPORT BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, RATIONAL FOR THE POLICY THEY'RE PROPOSING.
I'M GOING TO USE REGULATION AND INITIATIVE BECAUSE THE SCHOOL ABIDES BY BOTH OF THEM.
THEN IDENTIFIED, IT'S FORWARDED TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR THAT DIVISION.
AND THEN, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
FROM THER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ASSIGNED THE POLICY OWNER.
THEY WILL OWN IT THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.
THEY WILL BE THE ONES TO PRESENT IT TO YOU BEFORE THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION.
AND THEY WILL BE THE ONES TO ANNOUNCE AND DISTRIBUTE IT OUT.
>> QUESTION? ON THE POLICY INITIATION FORM, YOU SAY ANYO ORGANIZATION CAN BEGIN THERE, RIGHT? SO THE SECOND STATEMENT GOES TO THE FUNCTIONAL AREA LEAGUE.
DOES THE FUNCTIONAL AREA LEAD HAVE THE DISCRETION TO SAY IT SHOULD GO THROUGH OR NOT VALID?
THAT'S WHAT I MEANT BY REVIEW FOR SUFFICIENCY.
IT NEEDS TO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A NEED.
IT NEEDS TO PRESENT A CASE FOR THE MOVEMENT OF A POLICY.
IT'S NOT JUST OH, THIS IS MY IDEA.
>> WHAT DIFFERENCE OF OPINION? AND THE EMPLOYEE WHO INITIATED IT, DIFFERS WITH THE FUNCTIONAL AREA LEAD?
SO IN THAT CASE, THE EMPLOYEE WOULD BE ABLE TO GO BACK AND PRESENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THEIR CASE IN TERMS OF MAKING THAT ARGUMENT.
IF I STILL A DIFFERENCE, I WOULD SAY IT WOULD GO OVER TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER TO REVIEW TO DETERMINE IF THERE'S A NEED.
>> I THINK THAT TOO, THERE HAS TO BE A SECOND SET OF EYES IF THERE'S A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION.
BECAUSE IT COULD BE VERY SUBJECTIVE.
ULTIMATELY, SOMEONE HAS TO DECIDE --
BUT IF YOU ONLY HAVE ONE DECIDER, AT STEP TWO, MAYBE IT IS VALID, BUT DECIDER -- KIND OF LIKE WHAT IS HAPPENING -- SOMETIMES HAPPENS IN HR IN TERMS OF WHAT APPLICATIONS SHOULD MOVE FORWARD AND WHICH ONES SHOULDN'T.
>> AGAIN, THESE ARE JUST DRAFTS.
SO WE'LL TAKE YOUR FEEDBACK AND INCORPORATE AS NECESSARY.
SO THE POLICY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSEMBLING A STAKEHOLDER GROUP.
AND THAT GROUP IS GOING TO BE CHARGED WITH ACTUALLY WORKING THROUGH POLICY AND DEVELOPING A POLICY DRAFT.
AN INITIAL DRAFT FOR CIRCULATION.
WHEN GROUP, THEY'RE GOING TO SOLICIT INPUT FROM ALL OF THE PEOPLE THAT MIGHT BE IMPACTED, ALL THE DIFFERENT CONSTITUENCIES THAT MIGHT BE I IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICIES.
THAT WOULD INCLUDE HR, ACADEMIC COUNCILS WE MIGHT HAVE, FACULTY COUNCILS, SO EVERYONE'S VOICE COULD BE HEARD IN THAT PROCESS.
AT THIS POINT, POLICY OWNER, HOW IS THAT DEFINED? WOULD THE POLICY OWNER BE THE ONE WHO INITIATED IT?
THE POLICY OWNER IS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
[00:15:02]
OFFICER.>> SO IT'S A DUAL ROLE THEY HAVE IN TERMS OF CAO/POLICYHOLDER?
>> ARE THEY INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW PROCESS?
>> THEY CAN BE IF THEY'RE IDENTIFIED AS A STAKEHOLDER.
>> I IMAGINE THEY'RE STAKEHOLDER IF THEY'RE PUSHING THIS OVER.
>> MOST LIKELY IT WOULD COME FROM AN INDIVIDUAL WORKING WITHIN THAT FUNCTION AND PROPOSE THE POLICY.
BUT IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE.
>> SOMETIMES PEOPLE HAVE GOOD IDEAS THAT THEY THINK SOMEONE ELSE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT.
SO THERE MAY BE INSTANCES WHERE IT'S NOT A STAKEHOLDER --
>> SO ONCE THE INITIAL DRAFT IS CREATED, IT'S THEN SHARED WITH LEADERSHIP AND THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL.
AND THE LEGAL REVIEW IS REALLY A LEGAL REVIEW FOR CONSISTENT FORMAT AND FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY SO T MENTIONED TAKES OWNERSHIP OF THIS PROCESS.
SO THEY ARE THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING THE POLICY AFTER SUFFICIENT INPUT IS RECEIVED AND DRAFTED.
AND PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT THAT IT'S READY TO MOVE FORWARD.
FROM DEPARTMENT TAKES IT ON AND PREPARES IT FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OR PRESENTATION TO THE CHANCELLOR FOR APPROVAL.
AND IF IT'S NOT APPROVED, THEN, IT GOES BACK THROUGH THE ROUND AGAIN.
BEFO TO EITHER THE BOARD OR CHANCELLOR, IT HAS TO GO THROUGH ANOTHER REVIEW ROUND.
SO W REALLY CONTEMPLATES THE REVISION OR ADDITION OF POLICY, THERE ARE ALSO CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE WE WOULD NEED TO REMOVE A POLICY OR REGULATION.
SO A THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OR WHOEVER IS ASKING FOR THE APPROVAL.
THEY SUBMIT MEMORANDUM TO OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL TO REQUEST REMOVAL OF POLICY.
WE REVIEW IT FOR LEGAL IMPLIC MIGHT BE ATTACHED TO REMOVAL IMPACT ON THE COLLEGE IN TERMS OF PRACTICES THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLACE AND HOW IT MIGHT RELATE -- THAT APPROVAL MIGHT RELATE TO OTHER POLICIES, PROCEDURES, REGULATIONS WHAT HAVE YOU.
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON WHETHER WE SHOULD HAVE A SUNSET PRACTICE FOR ADDITIONS?
>> I'M NOT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW WE WOULD ACTUALLY PUT THAT INTO PRACTICE.
BUT REVIEW PROCESS SO WE CAN MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.
SO U WE'LL GET TO IT, A POLICY WILL BE REVIEWED EVERY SIX YEARS.
>> I DON'T IMAGINE THAT POLICY MAKES FOR GOOD FIT I'M READING.
SO IN TERMS OF RESCISSION, THIS WOULD BECOME REAL OBVIOUS THAT SOME POLICY NEEDS TO CHANGE, AND THAT'S HOW THE PROCESS KICKS OFF? IN HAD TERMS OF ADMINISTRATORS WHO WHOEVER IS IMPACTED BY CERTAIN POLICY.
>> YEAH, I THINK THAT -- A GOOD EXAMPLE, ONE THAT COMES TO MIND, WE HAVE SOMETHING ON THE BOOKS ABOUT AVAILABILITY TO WORK REMOTELY.
THAT I THINK IT'S BEEN -- I DON'T THINK IT SAYS HAS TO BE HERE SIX MONTHS AND APPROVAL FROM SUPERVISOR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THAT.
AS WE'VE BEEN UNDERTAKING EFFORT TO SAY LOOK AT NEW FLEX WORK POLICIES, PROCEDURES, WHICHEVER ONE IT IS, THAT THAT WAS OUTDATED.
AND SO IN THIS INSTANCE, YOU KNOW, THE PROCESS OWNER, THE CONTENT OWNER, WOULD PROBABLY BE CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER.
WE'VE HAD THE THING ON THE BOOKS THAT HAVEN'T BEEN REVIEWED IN AWHILE.
SO THEN, THE POLICY THE MAJORITY NUMBER OF PEOPLE, HOW WILL WE COMMUNICATE THIS TO THE ORGANIZATION SO THAT ANY STAFF MEMBER, THEY SEE AN ISSUE THAT MAYBE -- SO
THEY KNOW THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THAT TO BEGIN THE PROCESS AND -- >> SO, WE ARE GETTING TO THAT.
>> LET'S HOLD THE QUESTION SO WE CAN GET THROUGH.
>> ONCE WE REVIEW THE IMPACTS, WE WOULD THEN, HELP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, A PLAN TO MANAGE, AND IT WOULD BE APPROVED.
[00:20:03]
THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROCESS AND WE'VE COME ACROSS THIS BEFORE I BELIEVE IT WAS MENTIONED EARLY ON, THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE TIME-CONSUMING AND DON'T NECESSARILY -- SO THESE WOULD ALLOW FOR US, TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES IN ADDITION, WANT TO COVER THINGS THAT WOULD REQUIRE SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, WITH EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, IN ANY SUCH CASE WOULD STILL COME TO YOU FOR RATIFICATION.AND THEN THE UPDATES FOR THE REVIEW PROCESS IF IT GOES TO THE REVIEW BOARD TO SEE IF IT IS DISCUSSED AT FRONT AND THIS IS PRETTY MUCH WAS HAPPENING NOW AS WE GET A POLICY UPDATE, WE REVIEW IT TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT AND WE SHARE WITH STAKEHOLDERS.
NECESSARY STAKEHOLDERS GET THEIR INPUT AND THEN WE WOULD FORWARD IT TO YOU FOR APPROVAL AT ADOPTION.
SO THIS IS THE COMMUNICATION THAT WE HAVE.
THE CAO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COMMUNICATION TO STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING ANY CHANGE IN POLICY AND WHAT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE DO NOW IS GENERAL COUNSEL WOULD SEND OUT A DISTRIBUTION ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING CHANGES.
IN ADDITION, WE GOT TRAINING THAT THEY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE PROVIDING TRAINING TO THE NECESSARY GROUPS AS WELL ON ANY NEW POLICIES THAT REQUIRE THAT KIND OF TRAINING.
WE HAVE DISCUSSED IF WE WERE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS POLICY, THAT WE WOULD ANNOUNCE IT UNDER THE PROCESS AND ALSO, THE TRAINING PROCESS SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD BE AWARE AND IT GOES BACK TO THE ISSUE EARLIER OF INDIVIDUALS AND HOW THEY -- AND THE REVIEW PROCESS WOULD BE EVERY SIX YEARS.
WE HAVE TO DO THIS IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE, PRACTICES ARE IN LINE, POLICIES ARE IN LINE WITH PRACTICES AND AS WE CONTINUE TO EVOLVE, WE WILL CONTINUOUSLY UPDATE THEM.
AND THEN, FINALLY, PROPOSING A CENTRAL POLICY LIBRARY.
AS I MENTIONED RIGHT NOW, POLICIES DON'T ACTUALLY NEED THE TYPE OF POLICY SO WHAT WE WILL DO IS TRY, IN ADDITION TO THIS STATION ALSO PUT A REPOSITORY FOR ALL DOCUMENTS.
THE POLICY LIBRARY WOULD INCLUDE POLICY MANUALS AND ANY PROVED PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES WOULD BE INCLUDED IN SUCH A POLICY.
IT WOULD BE ORGANIZED ACCORDING TO CONSTITUENCIES THAT THIS IMPACT SO WE WOULD ALSO WANT TO AVOID, HAVING TO UPDATE IN MULTIPLE AREAS WHICH I THINK HAPPENS NOW, SO POLICY CHANGES BUT ON THIS WEBSITE THEY HAVE POLICY CHANGES SO INSTEAD OF THAT OCCURRING, WE WOULD REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL POLICY LIBRARY AS OPPOSED TO DUPLICATION OF POLICIES.
>> I LIKE HOW YOU ARE PLANNING TO HAVE IT ORGANIZED BY CATEGORY.
THAT WAY PEOPLE DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH 10,000 PAGES OF POLICY TO FIND ONE PARTICULARLY THAT WILL WORK.
>> AND THEN THESE ARE THE SUCCESS MARKERS WERE ALWAYS STRIVING FOR WITH COMPLIANCE AND OUR MISSION AND OBJECTIVES, UPDATED AND ACCOUNTABLE THROUGHOUT AND ENSURES SUFFICIENT INPUT AND ALSO ALL EMPLOYEES UNDERSTAND.
>> ONE LAST QUESTION, THE POLICY REGULATION, WE HAD SEPARATE CAMPUSES, TO HAVE SEVEN SEPARATE PROCEDURES AND POLICIES?
>> IS LESS PAGES ARE RELATED TO THE POWERPOINT.
>> AND IT WILL TAKE A WHILE BUT LIKE.[INAUDIBLE] >>.
[00:25:13]
YOU VERY MUCH.WORKFORCE COMMITTEE
MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.